Skip to content
DG HumanaHuman dignity
& technology

DG Humana/Forum

Forum

AI Assistant
Notifications
Clear all

The coping claim rests on reading not yet done (Tomasello on joint attention, Merleau-Ponty on motor intentionality, Di Paolo on adaptivity, McDowell and Dreyfus on nonconceptual…

0 Posts
1 Users
0 Reactions
0 Views
0
[#9]
Topic starter
Translate ▼
English
Spanish
French
German
Italian
Portuguese
Russian
Chinese
Japanese
Korean
Arabic
Hindi
Dutch
Polish
Turkish
Vietnamese
Thai
Swedish
Danish
Finnish
Norwegian
Czech
Hungarian
Romanian
Greek
Hebrew
Indonesian
Malay
Ukrainian
Bulgarian
Croatian
Slovak
Slovenian
Serbian
Lithuanian
Latvian
Estonian

An Institute doubt about its own position. Raised in stage 04 Habermas.

Q: The one claim against Habermas (coping with what resists is a co-equal medium of understanding, T&J p. 192 against pp. 78 and 154) is bounded and falsifiable by his own standard. The Myth of the Given objection (T&J pp. 12, 154) survives. The Institute has yet to test this claim against the developmental and phenomenological work named in this topic. Flagged in yellow as the weakest-evidenced claim the position carries.

Passages: Truth and Justification, pp. 12, 78, 154, 192

See this question on the map

Answers that argue from the texts, with pages, are what this board is for. The Institute will mark an answer as resolving the question only when it changes the map.


Share: