Skip to content
DG HumanaHuman dignity
& technology

DG Humana/Forum

Forum

AI Assistant
Notifications
Clear all

Ricoeur explains how metaphor changes meaning within language. Does metaphor presuppose a meaningful relation to what it describes?

0 Posts
1 Users
0 Reactions
0 Views
0
[#20]
Topic starter
Translate ▼
English
Spanish
French
German
Italian
Portuguese
Russian
Chinese
Japanese
Korean
Arabic
Hindi
Dutch
Polish
Turkish
Vietnamese
Thai
Swedish
Danish
Finnish
Norwegian
Czech
Hungarian
Romanian
Greek
Hebrew
Indonesian
Malay
Ukrainian
Bulgarian
Croatian
Slovak
Slovenian
Serbian
Lithuanian
Latvian
Estonian

An Institute doubt about its own position. Raised in stage 05 Ricoeur.

Q: The Institute asks whether both ordinary and metaphorical attribution already presuppose the relation to the world that we want to explain. Ricoeur’s discussion of plenitude (1981, p. 176) is a test for this reading. We have yet to establish from that passage that meaningful correspondence precedes metaphor.

Passages: Metaphor and the Central Problem of Hermeneutics, p. 176 (1981)

See this question on the map

Answers that argue from the texts, with pages, are what this board is for. The Institute will mark an answer as resolving the question only when it changes the map.


Share: