Skip to content
DG HumanaHuman dignity
& technology

DG Humana/Forum

Forum

AI Assistant
Notifications
Clear all

The legitimacy gap is where 'who decides what counts as a reason' lives. Which of the integrative, the distorting, and the critical functions does an automated determination…

0 Posts
1 Users
0 Reactions
0 Views
0
[#18]
Topic starter
Translate ▼
English
Spanish
French
German
Italian
Portuguese
Russian
Chinese
Japanese
Korean
Arabic
Hindi
Dutch
Polish
Turkish
Vietnamese
Thai
Swedish
Danish
Finnish
Norwegian
Czech
Hungarian
Romanian
Greek
Hebrew
Indonesian
Malay
Ukrainian
Bulgarian
Croatian
Slovak
Slovenian
Serbian
Lithuanian
Latvian
Estonian

An open question the Institute puts to the texts. Raised in stage 05 Ricoeur.

Q: Habermas's systematic distortion (HCI pp. 283–285) and Ricoeur's integrative ideology (IMA p. 178) describe the same institution from two sides. The institute's Commentary of October 18 asks who decides what counts as a reason; this is its hermeneutic form. M: our question in H12 remains: reciprocal criticism of ideology and utopia needs non-circular criteria.

Passages: Imagination in Discourse and Action, pp. 178–179 · HCI, pp. 283–285

See this question on the map

Answers that argue from the texts, with pages, are what this board is for. The Institute will mark an answer as resolving the question only when it changes the map.


Share: