<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>        <rss version="2.0"
             xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
             xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
             xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
             xmlns:admin="http://webns.net/mvcb/"
             xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#"
             xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/">
        <channel>
            <title>
									04 · Habermas picks up - DG Humana Institute Forum				            </title>
            <link>https://dghumana.com/community/habermas-picks-up/</link>
            <description>DG Humana Institute Discussion Board</description>
            <language>en-US</language>
            <lastBuildDate>Tue, 10 Nov 2026 16:41:05 +0000</lastBuildDate>
            <generator>wpForo</generator>
            <ttl>60</ttl>
							                    <item>
                        <title>04 · Habermas picks up — start here</title>
                        <link>https://dghumana.com/community/habermas-picks-up/04-%c2%b7-habermas-picks-up-start-here/</link>
                        <pubDate>Mon, 09 Nov 2026 21:34:03 +0000</pubDate>
                        <description><![CDATA[The Theory of Communicative Action and Truth and Justification read against the Relationship branch. The one claim the Institute carries against Habermas concerns coping with what resists (T...]]></description>
                        <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><em>The Theory of Communicative Action</em> and <em>Truth and Justification</em> read against the Relationship branch. The one claim the Institute carries against Habermas concerns coping with what resists (T&amp;J p. 192 against pp. 78 and 154).</p><p><strong>From the map.</strong> H: Communicative action coordinates purposes through criticizable validity claims against a lifeworld background (1:98–101); social inquiry reaches its object as a virtual participant (1:107–116); rationality is internal to sociology and universality is carried without metaphysical support (1:136–139). In Truth and Justification he states the relational thesis as Hegel&#x27;s, fills it with three media, and subordinates labor to linguistic disclosure by preference (pp. 183, 192). DGH: The purple topics mark where we think Habermas’s reconstruction requires or permits a pre-propositional relation. We test this reading against TCA 2:16–18 and 2:35 and Truth and Justification, pp. 12, 30, 78, 154, 183, 192.</p><p><a href="https://dghumana.com/hermeneutics-in-common/#t=670afdac">Open this stage on the map</a> · <a href="https://dghumana.com/hermeneutics-in-common/#stage-habermas">Read the stage outline</a></p><p><strong>How to respond.</strong> Start a topic for a station you want to contest, correct, or extend. Argue from the texts and give printed pages where you can; the map's notes give the Institute's page references. Readings that change the map are credited in the next version's changelog.</p>]]></content:encoded>
						                            <category domain="https://dghumana.com/community/habermas-picks-up/">04 · Habermas picks up</category>                        <dc:creator>D.G. Humana</dc:creator>
                        <guid isPermaLink="true">https://dghumana.com/community/habermas-picks-up/04-%c2%b7-habermas-picks-up-start-here/</guid>
                    </item>
							        </channel>
        </rss>
		